OU Essay Controversy: What Happened in the Samantha Fulnecky Case

In November 2025, University of Oklahoma (OU) student Samantha Fulnecky, a junior psychology major, submitted a reaction paper for a lifespan development / psychology course. The assignment asked students to respond to a scholarly article on gender typicality, peer relations, and mental health during early adolescence, focusing on how gender-related expectations affect young people’s social experiences and well-being.

In her essay, Fulnecky:

• Grounded her response in her Christian beliefs and Biblical framing.
• Argued that traditional gender roles reflect “God’s original plan for humans.”
• Wrote that “society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders” is “demonic.” (Oklahoman)

The essay was graded by graduate teaching assistant Mel Curth, who awarded it 0 out of 25 points, stating that the paper:

• Did not adequately answer the assignment’s questions or engage with the article,
• Relied heavily on personal ideology rather than empirical evidence in a scientific class,
• Included language (such as calling a group “demonic”) that Curth described as offensive, especially toward a minoritized population.

Fulnecky then filed a formal complaint with the university, alleging religious discrimination. After the case drew wide attention online, OU placed Curth on administrative leave during a formal review and reassigned a full-time professor to the course. The university has said it initiated a grade appeals process and took steps to ensure the student would not suffer “academic harm” from the graded assignment.

This single essay grade has now become a national flashpoint around religious expression, academic standards, gender identity, and campus free speech.

What’s Trending Now: How Different News Outlets Frame the Story

Although the core facts are similar, different outlets emphasize different aspects of the incident. Understanding these frames can help parents and students recognize how media shapes perception.

Fox News: Focus on Religious Discrimination and Anti-Christian Bias

Coverage from Fox News highlights Fulnecky’s claim that she was “targeted for her Christian beliefs.” It:

• Emphasizes her Biblical statements about gender and her view that multiple genders are a “lie.”
• Presents the zero grade as a response to her religious worldview.
• Features quotes from conservative figures describing universities as hostile to Christians and calling the student “an American hero” for standing firm in her faith. (Fox News)

In this framing, the story is primarily about religious freedom and an alleged anti-Christian bias within higher education.

Newsweek: Free Speech and Campus Climate

Newsweek’s reporting presents the situation as part of a broader debate over free speech on college campuses. It:

• Summarizes the assignment, the essay, the grade, and OU’s response.
• Notes that conservative groups and commentators have rallied around Fulnecky.
• Also includes responses from critics who argue the essay was poorly written and did not meet academic expectations.

Newsweek links the case to data from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), which found that only 36% of U.S. college students say it is “very” or “extremely” clear that free speech is protected on their campus. (Newsweek)

Here, the incident is framed as an example of ongoing tension between speech rights and campus norms.

Other Analysis Pieces: Academic Standards, Anti-Trans Harassment, and “Culture War”

Other outlets and commentators add additional angles:

• Some focus on academic rigor, arguing that the essay did not adequately reference the assigned article, did not use empirical sources, and would reasonably receive a failing grade in a scientific or psychology context. (Oklahoman)
• LGBTQ-focused outlets emphasize that Curth is a transgender instructor, noting that the essay explicitly described ideas about gender beyond the binary as “demonic,” and that Curth subsequently faced online harassment after being named publicly. (LGBTQ Nation)
• Some commentary characterizes the incident as part of a broader “culture war” over transgender rights and the role of religion in public institutions. (Them)

Overall, the news environment presents the same core event through different lenses: religious freedom, academic standards, LGBTQ+ rights, and campus free speech.

Who Are the Key Institutions? TPUSA and the University of Oklahoma

Turning Point USA (TPUSA)

Turning Point USA is a conservative student organization founded in 2012 by activist Charlie Kirk. It operates chapters on many college campuses and focuses on:

• Promoting free-market and socially conservative ideas,
• Organizing student activism,
• Publicizing incidents it views as examples of anti-conservative bias in higher education.

In this case, the TPUSA chapter at OU posted screenshots of the essay and the instructor’s comments on social media, strongly criticizing the zero grade and framing the situation as a case of ideological censorship and discrimination against a Christian student.

University of Oklahoma (OU)

The University of Oklahoma is a large public research university in Norman, Oklahoma. Like other U.S. universities, it has:

• A grade appeals process through which students can contest grades they believe are unfair or inconsistent with course expectations,
• Procedures for reviewing allegations of illegal discrimination, including claims related to religion,
• A parallel responsibility to uphold academic standards and course learning objectives. (Oklahoman)

In its public statement on this case, OU has said that it:

• Takes First Amendment concerns, including religious freedoms, very seriously.
• Immediately initiated a full review after receiving the student’s letter.
• A formal grade appeal was conducted, and steps were taken to ensure no academic harm to the student from the assignment.
• After the student filed a discrimination complaint, the university activated its review process.
• The graduate instructor was placed on administrative leave during the investigation.
• A full-time professor was assigned to take over the course for the remainder of the semester.

From an institutional perspective, OU is attempting to balance student rights, instructor authority, and public scrutiny.

Broader Background: Free Speech and Academic Standards on Campus

This incident sits within a larger national discussion about how personal beliefs, academic expectations, and campus policies intersect.

Free Speech Perceptions

Recent large-scale surveys of college students by FIRE and other organizations show that many students are uncertain whether their campuses fully protect free expression:

• One FIRE-associated analysis reported that only about one-third of students say it is “very” or “extremely” clear that free speech is protected on their campus.

At the same time, universities generally maintain policies that:

• Protect students’ rights to express religious or political views,
• Establish time, place, and manner rules for speech,
• Expect students to meet discipline-specific academic standards in coursework (such as using empirical sources in psychology or following citation styles).

Academic vs. Personal Reasoning

Many courses — especially in psychology, sociology, or other social sciences — expect students to:

• Demonstrate they have read the assigned text,
• Engage with research findings or theories,
• Support claims with empirical evidence,
• Distinguish between personal belief and evidence-based argument.

Assignments might invite “opinion,” but that opinion is usually expected to be grounded in the course material and relevant scholarly work. When a paper focuses mainly on personal or theological reasoning without engaging the text, instructors may view it as not meeting the assignment criteria, even if the core beliefs themselves are protected outside of the graded context.

The OU case highlights how confusing this distinction can feel to students, especially when coursework touches on morally or spiritually sensitive topics like gender, identity, and mental health.

Social Media and Reddit: How the Public Is Reacting

Beyond formal news coverage, the story has generated thousands of comments across platforms such as X (Twitter), Instagram, and Reddit. The large Reddit thread you shared illustrates how online communities are interpreting the case.

Here is a neutral summary of the main themes in those discussions:

A. Strong Criticism of the Essay’s Quality

Many commenters focus almost entirely on academic quality rather than beliefs. Common points include:

• The essay is described as closer to high-school level writing than junior-level college work.
• Users note issues with grammar, structure, and repetition.
• Several point out that the paper appears to contain few or no citations, even when making claims about Biblical meanings of specific Hebrew terms.

Some commenters argue the student did not sufficiently demonstrate that she read or understood the assigned article, beyond referencing its title or a single idea about teasing and gender roles.

B. Debate Over the Zero Grade

There is disagreement about whether the zero was appropriate:

• Some users say a failing grade is justified because the essay did not respond meaningfully to the prompt, did not engage with the research, or did not meet word-count rules.
• Others believe the instructor should have given partial credit based on the rubric (for meeting word count, basic coherence, etc.) or referred any citation issues to an academic integrity process instead.

This part of the conversation centers on grading philosophy and whether “zero” should be reserved for non-submission or extreme cases.

C. Academic Standards vs. Religious Expression

A recurring theme is whether and how religious arguments can appear in a psychology paper:

• Many commenters say students are free to hold religious beliefs but, in a scientific or psychology class, are still expected to support claims with peer-reviewed sources or empirical research.
• Others express concern that if students can frame any poor grade as religious discrimination, it may be harder for instructors to enforce academic standards consistently.

Some users distinguish between referencing the Bible in a well-structured, properly cited way versus relying on broad, uncited statements such as “the Bible says…”.

D. Allegations of Political Strategy

A noticeable subset of commenters speculate — without hard evidence — that the case may have been politically strategic, for example:

• Suggesting the student anticipated a low grade and planned to bring the issue to conservative media,
• Pointing to the family’s public support for conservative causes,
• Referencing Turning Point USA’s quick and prominent involvement.

From a neutral, educational perspective, these comments show how quickly academic disputes can be interpreted through a political lens, even when the official investigation is still ongoing.

E. Concern for the Instructor and for University Precedent

Many commenters express concern that:

• Placing the instructor on leave could discourage other graduate assistants and professors from grading controversial work honestly,
• Universities may feel pressured to adjust grades or discipline instructors whenever a politically charged complaint goes viral,
• The situation might set a precedent where academic expectations are perceived as negotiable when public pressure is high.

Others note that administrative leave is often a standard step during investigations — not necessarily evidence of wrongdoing — to protect both the student and the instructor while the facts are reviewed.

Final Words

As the University of Oklahoma continues its formal review, this case highlights how quickly classroom disagreements can expand into broader public debates. For students and families, it serves as a reminder that academic expectations, personal beliefs, and university policies often intersect in complex ways. Understanding assignment requirements, communicating clearly with instructors, and engaging thoughtfully with course materials are essential steps in navigating college coursework—especially when topics are sensitive or deeply personal.

About Think Academy

Think Academy, part of TAL Education Group, helps K–12 students succeed in school today by building strong math foundations and critical thinking skills. At the same time, we focus on the bigger picture—developing learning ability, curiosity, and healthy study habits that inspire a lifelong love of learning. With expert teachers, proven methods, and innovative AI tools, we support every child’s journey from classroom confidence to long-term growth.

To access Think Academy’s free math worksheets for students in PreK through Grade 12, download them here.

Want more insights into math learning and parenting? Fill out the form on this page and subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tips and the latest resources.